<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film: The Real Raw Format</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paweng.com/2009/03/02/film-the-real-raw-format/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paweng.com/2009/03/02/film-the-real-raw-format/</link>
	<description>Software, hardware, and the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:21:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: moorfame</title>
		<link>http://paweng.com/2009/03/02/film-the-real-raw-format/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>moorfame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paweng.com/?p=581#comment-293</guid>
		<description>I read that. He is right and your interpretation is correct. I like how he puts into perspective  5,000 USD Nikon D1H digital camera from 2002 with its  2.7 MP sensor. If you compare it to  shot done on film in this time perspective film wins. So in principle is he is right and I think he likes to upset digital jerks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that. He is right and your interpretation is correct. I like how he puts into perspective  5,000 USD Nikon D1H digital camera from 2002 with its  2.7 MP sensor. If you compare it to  shot done on film in this time perspective film wins. So in principle is he is right and I think he likes to upset digital jerks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
